Researcher seeks arXiv endorsement for multi-agent citation verification framework
A researcher is seeking an arXiv endorsement for a paper proposing a four-agent framework built on CrewAI that addresses hallucinated citations in LLM-generated literature reviews. The framework includes an Academic Retriever, Critical Reviewer, Technical Writer, and Editor/Verifier implementing claim-level citation verification.
Entities
Related
arXiv paper benchmarks LLM judges for citation quality in deep-research systems
A new arXiv paper studies the calibration of LLM judges used as reward models in reinforcement learning for citation quality in deep-research systems. The work evaluates how capable and biased an LLM judge must be to reliably score rubric criteria like source relevance and factual support for attribution-citation pairs. This matters for practitioners building RL-based systems that depend on automated citation verification.
Autoresearch, Claude and Constrained Optimization
A blog post by Elliot C. Smith explores using Anthropic's Claude for automated research, framing it as a constrained optimization problem. The post discusses how Claude can be guided to perform literature review, hypothesis generation, and experiment design within user-defined constraints, highlighting practical implications for AI-assisted scientific discovery.
ML community debates submission limits to ease review burden
A researcher working across multiple fields observes that the ML community's high submission volume is degrading review quality, as seen in recent ARR cycles. They question why ML does not adopt per-author submission caps used successfully in security (CCS) and computer architecture (DAC) conferences.
WebSwarm: a progressive recursive multi-agent system for deep-and-wide web search
WebSwarm is a new multi-agent web search system that addresses the limitations of single ReAct-style agents in handling deep and wide search tasks. It uses progressive recursive collaboration among agents to improve depth, coverage, and evidence-grounded expansion. The system is described in a paper posted on arXiv on July 9, 2026.
UniClawBench benchmark proposed for evaluating proactive AI agents in real-world tasks
Researchers introduced UniClawBench, a universal benchmark for evaluating proactive agents that operate everyday tools in real-world environments. Unlike existing benchmarks that rely on sandboxed settings and single-turn evaluations, UniClawBench aims to isolate specific model capabilities to identify root causes of agent failures.